you're reading...
abortion, war on women

HR 36 is a 22 week abortion ban not a 20 week ban. Why the lie?

H.R. 36 the supposed “20 weeks ban” based on ignoring the scientific literature about fetal pain does not ban abortion at 20 weeks it bans abortion at 22 weeks.

Why has no one made a big deal about this? It’s pretty important.

Here is the relevant passage from the bill:

HR36_3

Medicine does not use fertilization age. This is fact. We use gestational age which is based on the first date of the last menstrual period (LMP). This convention is so ingrained that it is built into the programs on ultrasounds to date pregnancies when the LMP is unknown and even with IVF pregnancies when  you know the exact date. A made up term like post-fertilization age has no place in medicine. So why would Rep. Trent Franks use such gibberish?

The confusion is purposeful to dissuade patients

If you wanted women to be confused you would use confusing language. Say this bill passes, and it is a possibility, if you hear that abortion is illegal at the GOP”s fake “20 weeks” and you are medically (so using real science terms) 19 weeks you will think it is too late. This will especially be the case of you have an anti-choice provider who may not correct you. However, in reality the ban is at 22 weeks so at 19 real science weeks you do have time.

The confusion is purposeful to scare doctors

Doctors are practicing medicine and they may not check on the bill language, after all the press hasn’t been super up on it, or they may know this is really 22 weeks but they are scared because they have been threatened with jail time for practicing medicine according to the standard of care. Criminal charges are not covered by malpractice insurance and even if your defense is successful it will cost time, money and stress. All it takes is one zealous District Attorney looking to make a name in the party.

Establish fake fertilization age as the standard for “personhood”

The goal of the radical right and misogynistic science haters everywhere, like Rep. Trent Franks, is to make abortion illegal by declaring a fertilized egg a person. Getting post fertilization age into a federal law would be a major step in that direction as it would have permanently changed the goal posts by corrupting scientific terminology to a religious end.

Rep. Trent Franks got bad advice

The bill is filled with trash and gibberish and is not based in science. The “fetal pain at 22 weeks” side has provided not one shred of evidence that supports their position. If the people who advised him are unintelligent enough to understand the science of fetal pain perhaps they similarly ill-advised him on gestational age.

Rep. Trent Franks is not intelligent enough to understand the science

Perhaps Re. Franks was given the right information but just couldn’t comprehend it. When someone gets something so obvious to every first year biology student (and many high school students) so blindingly wrong one does have to wonder if perhaps they just didn’t have the ability to understand the science.

 

Rep. Trent Franks doesn’t care, doesn’t care to know, or is willfully and malevolently twisting words to achieve an end. I hope several reporters ask him why so we can all understand. So please everyone, especially the media, be accurate because that seems to be an issue for Rep. Franks. Call HR 36 what it is, a 22 week abortion ban. This doesn’t require a degree in neuroanatomy or a medical degree to understand this is basic biology 101 and Franks and everyone else supporting this bill needs to be called on it.

Legislation should not be based on lies or mistakes and we deserve to know which it is.

Discussion

13 thoughts on “HR 36 is a 22 week abortion ban not a 20 week ban. Why the lie?

  1. The first day of the last menstrual period is universal; I have never heard of any other timescale being used.

    A question: is there any accurate test to determine exactly when ‘natural’ fertilisation happened? My guess is that there isn’t, or at least not with any great accuracy, but I don’t actually know. Is there?

    Posted by korhomme | October 5, 2017, 2:06 pm
      • Thank you. Yet again this idea is a figment of ‘legislators’ imagination’.

        Posted by korhomme | October 5, 2017, 3:32 pm
      • I am not a doctor … yet I keep telling people that the moment of fertilization cannot be determined because many concepti leave the uterus upon menstruation. No implantation, no pregnancy … and since the moment of implantation can’t be determined either, that’s why we use LMP.

        I sometimes feel like screaming “Am I the only one who paid attention during high school biology and health classes?” Because that’s how basic this knowledge should be.

        Posted by Sharon E. Cathcart | October 15, 2017, 7:07 am
  2. Why don’t YOU go explain it to the people who are making this stupid law! THey will be like a deer in headlights to hear an OGBYN explain it than their Pat Robinson or whoever that quack Conservative Religious Fanatic is. I would love to see that!

    Posted by Wendy Bar | October 5, 2017, 3:40 pm
  3. Guttmacher’s making a point of being clear about it: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abortions

    Posted by Irene | October 5, 2017, 4:20 pm
    • From above: “24 states impose prohibitions after a certain number of weeks; 17 of these states ban abortion at about 20 weeks post-fertilization or its equivalent of 22 weeks after the woman’s last menstrual period on the grounds that the fetus can feel pain at that point in gestation.” So this muddying of the waters around which date they’re using has been going on a while.

      Posted by Irene | October 5, 2017, 4:24 pm
  4. Really. Enough is enough. Abortion is legal in this country. They want the equivalent of Sharia law, and no birth control either. What country is this? What are we becoming?

    Posted by Jacqueline Levine | October 5, 2017, 4:47 pm
    • This is the USA and we are NOT becoming anY thing we are just reverting back to what we were …welcome to the 1870s . As far as sharia goes this is the evangelical Christian version of the same.

      Posted by Russ | October 7, 2017, 1:47 pm
  5. It would be interesting to find out if any one that put this Bill together is a member of the Medical Profession or just a bunch of ******** . ( With utmost respect ) .

    Posted by Jim | October 6, 2017, 12:54 am
  6. I seem to remember one senator or representative asking if I woman could swallow a camera to give a picture of the baby. And then there was the guy who believed that you couldn’t possibly get pregnant from rape. I think willful ignorance is the most likely explanation, except that it’s a step or three past “willful”. More rabidly determined ignorance.

    Posted by Star Lady | October 7, 2017, 1:10 am
  7. These are probably the same sort of people who think that fertilization happens within an hour or so of sex. In other words, “it happens inside of a woman, so I’m just going to go with whatever allows us to keep controlling women. That way, I only have to think about lady-parts when I’m sticking my dick in one.”

    Posted by The_L1985 | October 14, 2017, 12:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Recent Tweets

%d bloggers like this: