I have been a gynecologist for over 20 years. Including residency I have been performing pelvic exams for over 26 years. I have done thousands of routine well-woman pelvic exams and thousands of exams for women with symptoms. While my personal n of 1 is certainly not research I have not once picked up a health condition in a truly asymptomatic woman with a routine pelvic exam. A routine pelvic exam includes looking at the vulva, placing a speculum in the vagina to look at the cervix, and a bimanual exam (one gloved hand is placed vaginally with the other on the abdomen to assess the size and shape of the uterus and ovaries). Sometimes a rectovaginal exam (one finger in the rectum and one in the vagina) is also performed. I bring this up in light of the US Preventative Services Task Force findings that there is inadequate evidence to recommend screening pelvic examinations (vulva, speculum, and bimanual exam) for the early detection and treatment of a variety of gynecologic conditions in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women.

I have definitely seen women harmed, both directly and indirectly, from routine pelvic exams. Indirectly because the doctor thought they felt a mass and so an unnecessary and possibly painful and definitely expensive ultrasound was ordered (never mind the anxiety waiting for the results). I have also heard of doctors who diagnose asymptomatic vaginal wall or uterine prolapse during exams and then either the patient worries about it unnecessarily or worse, the doctor recommends surgery. Asymptomatic prolapse happens to almost all women as A) the vagina is built to stretch and B) gravity. Asymptomatic prolapse does not require anything and yet some of these women end up with expensive and definitely not needed surgeries that have not an insignificant risk of complications. I have also seen very many women scarred emotionally by a pelvic exam with real physical ramifications. A painful pelvic exam, besides being wrong and painful, can trigger pelvic floor muscle spasm and lead to pelvic pain and pain with sex. As an aside, if a pelvic exam is painful for an asymptomatic woman either the examiner is unskilled or uncaring or there is actually a medical condition that has simply not yet caused sufficient discomfort or irritation to trigger symptoms. It is almost always the former.

I have also seen women who believed they were asymptomatic when they were not. A woman who reported she was fine, but during pelvic exam she could not relax her buttocks on the table and so we stopped and an in depth discussion revealed she had pain with sex . I have also seen women who didn’t think they had a health issue, but I found redness on the vulva and that triggered me to ask one more time about incontinence. If a woman is not bothered by her incontinence and wouldn’t have surgery or take medications she may not mention it even when asked, but the redness makes me ask about skin care and pads and then I find out she is using menstrual pads instead of incontinence pads. There is a difference and the former will cause irritation where the latter will not. However, most if not all of these “gets” could be identified with a detailed history or at the time of the Pap and certainly do not need the added bimanual exam. I honestly can’t think of one time the bimanual exam has made a difference for a woman who clearly had no symptoms.

Every now and then the fact that you did a pelvic exam that wasn’t painful helps a woman trust you with other very intimate information. Sometimes she discloses a rape, or pain with sex, or the fact she no longer has orgasms, or that she has fecal incontinence. Many things we manage in OB/GYN are difficult or embarrassing and sometimes it takes physical proof that a woman can trust you before she discloses. I am not sure how this could be measured in studies or if it has ever even been measured, but I know it is true because it happens in my office. However, as the speculum exam is usually the hardest for most women a routine Pap may still offer this physical demonstration of trust.

Once or twice I have seen a woman at her routine exam and identified an advanced vulvar cancer. She actually had symptoms, but was ignoring them out of fear. She was finally pestered enough to come in for her Pap smear, but the look at her vulva before the Pap smear would have identified the cancer. Again, the bimanual exam would not have helped.

What is often missing from the discussion is that many women think they are asymptomatic (or want to believe they are asymptomatic) when they are not. Sometimes it is being medically naive and other times it is intentional. Fear or the cost of going to the doctor makes people justify a whole host of symptoms. We all want to believe what we want to believe. It is also important to mention that health literacy and comfort with sharing intimate details varies as does the skill of the person asking the questions. What I as a gynecologist with over 25 years experience know to be asymptomatic may not be translatable to the general public and yet a routine bimanual exam and speculum (outside of a Pap smear) offers nothing. So what are we to do?

We should be more accurate with the terminology and not use the global term pelvic exam. Using the term “routine pelvic exam” could be confusing as a Pap smear requires a speculum and is routine and involves the pelvis. Many women think a Pap smear is a pelvic exam and vice verse. I have seen women not come in for Pap smears for years and years because they thought it was done the three times they were seen in the emergency room for pelvic pain, but what they had was only the bimanual and so they missed out on 10 years of cervical screening. I propose using the term routine bimanual and speculum instead of pelvic exam. Yes it is more cumbersome, but it is also more accurate and that is what matters.

Women should be told that a routine bimanual and a speculum exam when there are truly no symptoms offers no cancer screening and that no study has shown it offers much of anything at all. Similarly women should know that a Pap smear screens for cervical cancer, requires a speculum, and is different from a bimanual exam. Women should also know how often they need a Pap smear (check this link from ACOG or the image below).

Doctors must be educated that the only way to detect ovarian cancer or uterine cancer with a bimanual exam would be with magic. Doctors should also only do the exam that is needed. For example, when I see woman with a yeast infection I don’t take the opportunity to check her uterus and ovaries with a bimanual if the symptoms do not warrant it.

Women do still need to check in with a reproductive health specialist, whether that is once a year or once every two or three years depends on a lot of factors. When women come to the gynecologist we do ask questions about birth control, domestic violence, multiple sex partners, and incontinence (just to name a tiny fraction of what we discuss). Some women will know they are asymptomatic, but others will incorrectly identify normal as abnormal and others will brush of abnormal as nothing to worry about. It is not uncommon to find out at annual exam that a woman discontinued her birth control four months before, is having unprotected intercourse, and does not want to be pregnant. Waiting 2 years and 4 months instead of 4 months to find this out is not ideal. An asymptomatic woman with normal Pap smears who is HPV negative who historically has had lots of issues with contraception might warrant a different follow-up than an asymptomatic woman on year five of her copper IUD. If a woman has a relationship with her GYN health provider and she develops symptoms she may bring them up sooner if she has someone with whom she has a medical relationship. For some women a Pap every three years will be build more than enough trust and for others an annual check in will be needed. A first encounter, be it for a Pap smear or vaginal discharge, should be followed by a discussion of how often regular follow-up is warranted. It may be very reasonable to touch base simply by phone between Pap smears.

ACOG’s Well-Woman Task Force (2013) concluded that the inclusion of speculum examination and bimanual examination for asymptomatic women should be a “shared, informed decision between patient and clinician,” but I think it would be pretty hard for some women to say no if the bimanual exam were offered especially if they were already undressed. I have a hard time telling my hairdresser I don’t want the expensive deep conditioner that they offer that really doesn’t seem to make a noticeable difference in my hair and I’m fully clothed and there is no specter of cancer. There is a huge power differential in the doctor’s office and many patients may be worried about not pleasing their doctor, feel pressured because of time, or think if it is up for discussion then it must have some value. This is America and in general the default for everyone, medical or not, seems to be over test.

To me the answer is being really clear about de linking Pap and STI testing from routine bimanual and speculum exams. We need to educate women and providers that a bimanual exam and speculum exam when there are no symptoms seems to offer nothing, while not forgetting that checking in about symptoms and some kind of regular discussion about reproductive health may be needed more often than every three years. Women over 65 who no longer need Pap smears may similarly benefit from check ins. Whether this needs to occur every one, two, or three years will depend on many factors.

The data doesn’t support a regular GYN check up with a bimanual and speculum exam for asymptomatic women, but an annual or biennial check in may very well be invaluable.





Join the Conversation


Leave a Reply to jennifer B Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. It’s good to know that fear often leads women to believe that they’re asymptomatic when they often aren’t. My wife has been telling me about some cramps and pains that she’s been having in her abdominal area, but she insists that she’s fine. I’ll pass this information along to her so that she can go visit her gynecologist.

  2. Thank you for this in depth explanation. I’ve often heard that you really can’t palpate organs especially as bmi increases. So it seems a bit over kill to do this asymptomatically every year. Great read. I have a follow up question. Why does nearly every piece of literature say “pap smears don’t hurt they are slightly uncomfortable with a bit of pressure but not painful”. Every one I’ve had is pinching the hell out of my insides and extremely painful. I’ve stopped going altogether.

  3. So perhaps I am the exception, but my gyn found an ovarian cyst the size of a plum during a routine bimanual exam. I truly was asymptomatic at the time but it probably would have presented as excruciating pain if not discovered and removed when it was. I understand there are pros and cons to any medical recommendation, and that I may have been the exception. But what Dr. Gunter recommends means that my cyst would not have been discovered until I had symptoms. She says, “we need to educate women and providers that a bimanual exam and speculum exam when there are no symptoms seems to offer nothing, while not forgetting that checking in about symptoms and some kind of regular discussion about reproductive health may be needed more often than every three years.” In my case, the bimanual exam offered something beneficial. For me the question is, even if the exceptions to this recommendation are not statistically significant, are there possible results or findings that would be medically significant to that particular patient? And if so, should the possibility of such be communicated and offered as an option during a discussion outside of the examining room? As a patient, I like to know my options and decide for myself rather than have a doctor decide for me.

  4. Great to read this. Most of us don’t know what is ‘normal’. We know what’s normal for us, and assume that everyone is having the same experience. And sometimes things change so gradually it’s only on reflection we realise how much they have changed. It’s only at the doctor’s office for a checkup, that you find out that ‘no, that’s not how things should/have to be’ and get it dealt with.

    When my daughter was about 9 she had a bad cough, and we ended up at a paediatric respiratory physician’s office. She asked my daughter if she had burning in her upper chest after eating. Yes, said daughter. ‘What?’ said I. Turns out she’d had heartburn her whole life after meals, had assumed everyone did, and just never mentioned it. She was genuinely surprised to learn that no one else did.

  5. Good article but it doesn’t go far enough – it is hard for physicians to realize they have been doing something that causes more harm then benefit.

    American College of Physicians ACP recommends AGAINST performing screening pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult women (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence) Pelvic examination means the speculum and bimanual examination. The current evidence shows that harms outweigh any demonstrated benefits associated with the screening pelvic examination.

    Performing routine pelvic examination adds both $2.6 billion of unnecessary costs to the health care system and opportunity costs.

    No studies evaluated the potential indirect benefit of annual pelvic examination being an incentive for women to access health care and eventually receive recommended gynecologic services, such as contraception, screening for sexually transmitted infections, or other nongynecologic care.

    Bottom line we could free up literally millions and millions of hours of primary care time if gyns accepted that they have been performing a procedure on women that is neither necessary nor adds any value to women and in fact frequently causes harm.

    It is a classic example of the lack of evidence in much of women’s health. Take on “annual” screening mammograms next (they don’t reduce mortality) and watch how the spark fly.

  6. In the UK, women would mostly get this through their GP; going directly to a specialist isn’t so common.

    A couple of questions:how much influence does the itemised pay-for-services affect what is done at a ‘routine’ check? And, when at the GP here they go through a checklist of questions and things to do, such as taking blood pressure. Similar in the US?

  7. Why are there not more doctors like you? Such a useful article. I don’t have a vagina + other female bits but my wife does and I have copied your post to her. We’re in our 60s, a time when our bodies are getting a bit creaky.

%d bloggers like this: